TReDS Decoded: How Trade Receivables Discounting Is Quietly Fixing India’s MSME Cash-Flow Problem
Category: MSME & Trade Finance | Deep Dive · Prepared for Finoscape — India’s Daily Tax & Regulatory Intelligence Hub
Category: MSME & Trade Finance | Deep Dive · Prepared for Finoscape — India’s Daily Tax & Regulatory Intelligence Hub
Clause 18 of the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 (pending before a Joint Parliamentary Committee) proposes raising Companies Act ‘small company’ thresholds under Section 2(85) from ₹10cr/₹100cr to ₹20cr/₹200cr.
Karnataka HC holds Sections 73/74 CGST Act notices are not financial-year specific, upholding consolidated multi-year SCNs and deepening a live split with Bombay, Kerala, Madras, AP and Himachal Pradesh High Courts.
Delhi HC holds the Finance Act 2025’s 10% GST penalty pre-deposit under Section 107(6) doesn’t apply where the Show Cause Notice pre-dates the 1 Oct 2025 amendment — appellate rights are fixed on the SCN date, not the order date.
Executive Summary The ICAI Disciplinary Committee, Bench-II, has held a Mumbai-based Chartered Accountant guilty of professional misconduct under Item (7)
The Himachal Pradesh High Court, in H.M. Steels Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. (CWP No. 6070/2024, judgment dated
The CBIC’s GST-Investigation Wing has issued Instruction No. 01/2026-GST, dated 3 August 2026, directing all Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of
ITAT Mumbai denies ₹240+ crore in carried-forward losses in Sterling Holiday Resorts Ltd. v. DCIT, holding that a holding company’s shares cannot substitute for the resulting company’s own share issuance under Section 2(19AA) of the Income-tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai Denies Tax-Neutral Demerger: Why the Holding Company’s Shares Weren’t Enough Read Post »
Bombay High Court holds that where a bona fide dispute exists over Section 50 interest computation, the department must first pass a speaking order before resorting to garnishee proceedings under Section 79 of the CGST Act. BVG India Ltd. v. Union of India.
The Supreme Court has stayed a fresh Section 74 CGST show cause notice after finding it duplicated a demand already pending in statutory appeal — a reminder that parallel proceedings on the same tax demand raise a substantial jurisdictional question.