Five Years Later, Section 16(5) Comes Through: Gauhati HC Quashes a GST Order Because the Taxpayer Filed on Time All Along
The Story Sometimes the law catches up with a taxpayer years after the fact — in their favour, for once.
The Story Sometimes the law catches up with a taxpayer years after the fact — in their favour, for once.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court holds the GST common portal was never notified for service of notices or orders under Section 146 — and the Rajasthan High Court, applying that reasoning, condones a 645-day appeal delay.
The Supreme Court quashes a ₹890.52 crore GST demand and equal penalty against Tata Steel, holding — for the second time in a week — that Section 74’s extended limitation cannot be invoked by mechanically alleging fraud or suppression without foundational facts in the notice itself.
The Supreme Court holds that a GST Section 74 show cause notice cannot invoke the extended limitation period merely by using the words “fraud,” “wilful misstatement” or “suppression of facts” — the notice itself must specify the allegations. G.R. Infra Projects’ SCN quashed.